The ramblings of a disconcerted citizen
In uncertain times the ideas of a civilised society are tested almost to breaking point, but the point of a real civilised society is that it is able to protect the most vulnerable in society at the times they are most in need.
Over the past few years it appears to me that our civil society structure is being tested possibly beyond breaking point.
We are told by our politicians that we are “all in this together”, while at the same time advocating damaging policies that seem to be aimed at the most vulnerable in our society. This is not party political, but a general observation.
It has been revealed in a recent study that with care for the elderly, 20% of our hospitals do not even provide care that would be adequate in law, and over half of the hospitals failed to meet basic standards. Can this be justified in any society?
Councils up and down the country are closing libraries as they are seen as a “soft” target to cut costs. The argument is that everyone can use the internet, conveniently forgetting that 20% of households do not have access to the internet, and that certain sections of our society can only access reading material and the internet via libraries.
Of course these sections of our communities tend to be the old; young; unemployed; disabled; single parents and those in poverty. In other words, those at the margins of our society and the most vulnerable.
Assessment’s for Employment Support Allowance (ESA) and the general stigmatisation of anyone with a disability who claims benefits in the national press is yet another cause for concern. The many stories that are told by those with physical and mental disabilities about how they have been treated in their assessments for benefits are quite horrific. Indeed so horrific, that the process itself quite often exacerbates any illness the applicant has.
Mental illness has been at the forefront of this injustice. It appears to be the case, that it is acceptable to refuse people ESA on the most flimsy of grounds and to provide an assessment in a short period of time with a tick sheet mentality.
We all know that the diagnosis of a mental illness can take a long time, even years, and many mental illnesses can change on a day by day or even hour by hour basis. So how can an assessment be made so quickly that will affect the living standards and quality of life of an individual and their family?
I could give many examples, whether from those suffering from Bipolar; depression; social anxiety; personality disorders and so on. One day that person could be fit for work, the next they may be completely incapacitated. Yet the criteria for those making decisions that will affect the wellbeing and health of a human being is being stripped down to a tick sheet and the need to cut costs. It appears that no consideration is being given to the consequences of these decisions, even if it means in a minority of cases, death.
Mental health services are also being stretched to breaking point with the need to make space for the next patient in a crisis being paramount.
It strikes me that those with mental illnesses are the easy targets for the powers that be. Our society is becoming a case of “WHO SHOUTS LOUDEST”. Whether it is the young; the elderly; those in social need or the ill, they have become the easy targets. The question is, why should people have to fight to be treated with respect? It is clear that many in mental distress will find it most difficult to fight against an unjust decision by benefit agencies, which must be known by those implementing the policies.
It now appears from the evidence of real people at the sharp end that the safety net is no longer catching all those it was set up to help.
I have to ask, IS THIS REALLY OUR CIVIL SOCIETY?